Introduction

In this article, I’m going to show you the best way to map a ManyToMany association when using JPA and Hibernate.

As simple as JPA annotations might be, it’s not always obvious how efficient they are behind the scenes. In this article, I’m going to show you what is the best way to use the JPA @ManyToMany annotation when using Hibernate.

Domain Model

Assuming we have the following database tables:

A typical many-to-many database association includes two parent tables which are linked through a third one containing two Foreign Keys referencing the parent tables.

Implementing the ManyToMany JPA and Hibernate association using a List

The first choice for many Java developers is to use a java.util.List for Collections that don’t entail any specific ordering.

@Entity(name = "Post")
@Table(name = "post")
public class Post {

    @Id
    @GeneratedValue
    private Long id;

    private String title;

    public Post() {}

    public Post(String title) {
        this.title = title;
    }

    @ManyToMany(cascade = { 
        CascadeType.PERSIST, 
        CascadeType.MERGE
    })
    @JoinTable(name = "post_tag",
        joinColumns = @JoinColumn(name = "post_id"),
        inverseJoinColumns = @JoinColumn(name = "tag_id")
    )
    private List<Tag> tags = new ArrayList<>();

    //Getters and setters ommitted for brevity

    public void addTag(Tag tag) {
        tags.add(tag);
        tag.getPosts().add(this);
    }

    public void removeTag(Tag tag) {
        tags.remove(tag);
        tag.getPosts().remove(this);
    }

    @Override
    public boolean equals(Object o) {
        if (this == o) return true;
        if (!(o instanceof Post)) return false;
        return id != null && id.equals(((Post) o).getId());
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
        return getClass().hashCode();
    }
}

@Entity(name = "Tag")
@Table(name = "tag")
public class Tag {

    @Id
    @GeneratedValue
    private Long id;

    @NaturalId
    private String name;

    @ManyToMany(mappedBy = "tags")
    private List<Post> posts = new ArrayList<>();

    public Tag() {}

    public Tag(String name) {
        this.name = name;
    }

    //Getters and setters ommitted for brevity

    @Override
    public boolean equals(Object o) {
        if (this == o) return true;
        if (o == null || getClass() != o.getClass()) return false;
        Tag tag = (Tag) o;
        return Objects.equals(name, tag.name);
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
        return Objects.hash(name);
    }
} 

There are several aspects to note on the aforementioned mapping that are worth explaining/

First of all, the tags association in the Post entity only defines the PERSIST and MERGE cascade types. As explained in this article, the REMOVE entity state transition doesn’t make any sense for a @ManyToMany JPA association since it could trigger a chain deletion that would ultimately wipe both sides of the association.

As explained in this article, the add/remove utility methods are mandatory if you use bidirectional associations so that you can make sure that both sides of the association are in sync.

The Post entity uses the entity identifier for equality since it lacks any unique business key. As explained in this article, you can use the entity identifier for equality as long as you make sure that it stays consistent across all entity state transitions.

The Tag entity has a unique business key which is marked with the Hibernate-specific @NaturalId annotation. When that’s the case, the unique business key is the best candidate for equality checks.

The mappedBy attribute of the posts association in the Tag entity marks that, in this bidirectional relationship, the Post entity owns the association. This is needed since only one side can own a relationship, and changes are only propagated to the database from this particular side.

For more details about the @NaturalId annotation, check out this article.

Although the mapping is correct from a JPA and Hibernate perspective, from a database perspective, the previous ManyToMany relationship mapping is not efficient at all. To understand why it is so, you need to log and analyze the automated generated SQL statements.

Considering we have the following entities:

final Long postId = doInJPA(entityManager -> {
    Post post1 = new Post("JPA with Hibernate");
    Post post2 = new Post("Native Hibernate");

    Tag tag1 = new Tag("Java");
    Tag tag2 = new Tag("Hibernate");

    post1.addTag(tag1);
    post1.addTag(tag2);

    post2.addTag(tag1);

    entityManager.persist(post1);
    entityManager.persist(post2);

    return post1.id;
});

When removing a Tag entity from a Post:

doInJPA(entityManager -> {
    Tag tag1 = new Tag("Java");
    Post post1 = entityManager.find(Post.class, postId);
    post1.removeTag(tag1);
});

Hibernate generates the following SQL statements:

SELECT p.id AS id1_0_0_,
       t.id AS id1_2_1_,
       p.title AS title2_0_0_,
       t.name AS name2_2_1_,
       pt.post_id AS post_id1_1_0__,
       pt.tag_id AS tag_id2_1_0__
FROM   post p
INNER JOIN 
       post_tag pt 
ON     p.id = pt.post_id
INNER JOIN 
       tag t 
ON     pt.tag_id = t.id
WHERE  p.id = 1

DELETE FROM post_tag
WHERE  post_id = 1

INSERT INTO post_tag
       ( post_id, tag_id )
VALUES ( 1, 3 )

So, instead of deleting just one post_tag entry, Hibernate removes all post_tag rows associated to the given post_id and reinserts the remaining ones back afterward. This is not efficient at all because it’s extra work for the database, especially for recreating indexes associated with the underlying Foreign Keys.

For this reason, it’s not a good idea to use the java.util.List for @ManyToMany JPA associations.

Implementing the ManyToMany JPA and Hibernate association using a Set

Instead of a List, we can use a Set.

The Post entity tags association will be changed as follows:

@ManyToMany(cascade = { 
    CascadeType.PERSIST, 
    CascadeType.MERGE
})
@JoinTable(name = "post_tag",
    joinColumns = @JoinColumn(name = "post_id"),
    inverseJoinColumns = @JoinColumn(name = "tag_id")
)
private Set<Tag> tags = new HashSet<>();

And the Tag entity will undergo the same modification:

@ManyToMany(mappedBy = "tags")
private Set<Post> posts = new HashSet<>();

If you worry about the lack of a predefined entry order, then you need to use a SortedSet instead of Set while providing either a @SortNatural or a @SortComparator.

For instance, if the Tag entity implements Comparable, you can use the @SortNatural annotation as illustrated by the following example:

@ManyToMany(cascade = {CascadeType.PERSIST, CascadeType.MERGE})
@JoinTable(name = "post_tag",
    joinColumns = @JoinColumn(name = "post_id"),
    inverseJoinColumns = @JoinColumn(name = "tag_id")
)
@SortNatural
private SortedSet<Tag> tags = new TreeSet<>();

Now, when rerunning the previous test case, Hibernate generates the following SQL statements:

SELECT p.id AS id1_0_0_,
       t.id AS id1_2_1_,
       p.title AS title2_0_0_,
       t.name AS name2_2_1_,
       pt.post_id AS post_id1_1_0__,
       pt.tag_id AS tag_id2_1_0__
FROM   post p
INNER JOIN 
       post_tag pt 
ON     p.id = pt.post_id
INNER JOIN 
       tag t 
ON     pt.tag_id = t.id
WHERE  p.id = 1

DELETE FROM post_tag
WHERE  post_id = 1 AND tag_id = 3

Much better! There is only one DELETE statement executed which removes the associated post_tag entry.

I'm running an online workshop on the 27th of May about High-Performance SQL.

If you enjoyed this article, I bet you are going to love my Book and Video Courses as well.

Conclusion

Using JPA and Hibernate is very convenient since it can boost developer productivity. However, this does not mean that you have to sacrifice application performance.

By choosing the right mappings and data access pattern, you can make the difference between an application that barely crawls and one that runs at warp speed.

So, when using the @ManyToMany annotation, always use a java.util.Set and avoid the java.util.List.

Insert details about how the information is going to be processed

DOWNLOAD NOW