The Builder pattern and the Spring framework

(Last Updated On: January 4, 2018)

Introduction

I like to make use of the builder pattern whenever an object has both mandatory and optional properties. But building objects is usually the Spring framework responsibility, so let’s see how you can employ it using both Java and XML-based Spring configurations.

A Builder example

Let’s start with the following Builder class.

public final class Configuration<T extends DataSource> extends ConfigurationProperties<T, Metrics, PoolAdapter<T>> {

    public static final long DEFAULT_METRIC_LOG_REPORTER_PERIOD = 5;

    public static class Builder<T extends DataSource> {
        private final String uniqueName;
        private final T targetDataSource;
        private final PoolAdapterBuilder<T> poolAdapterBuilder;
        private final MetricsBuilder metricsBuilder;
        private boolean jmxEnabled = true;
        private long metricLogReporterPeriod = DEFAULT_METRIC_LOG_REPORTER_PERIOD;

        public Builder(String uniqueName, T targetDataSource, MetricsBuilder metricsBuilder, PoolAdapterBuilder<T> poolAdapterBuilder) {
            this.uniqueName = uniqueName;
            this.targetDataSource = targetDataSource;
            this.metricsBuilder = metricsBuilder;
            this.poolAdapterBuilder = poolAdapterBuilder;
        }

        public Builder setJmxEnabled(boolean enableJmx) {
            this.jmxEnabled = enableJmx;
            return this;
        }

        public Builder setMetricLogReporterPeriod(long metricLogReporterPeriod) {
            this.metricLogReporterPeriod = metricLogReporterPeriod;
            return this;
        }

        public Configuration<T> build() {
            Configuration<T> configuration = new Configuration<T>(uniqueName, targetDataSource);
            configuration.setJmxEnabled(jmxEnabled);
            configuration.setMetricLogReporterPeriod(metricLogReporterPeriod);
            configuration.metrics = metricsBuilder.build(configuration);
            configuration.poolAdapter = poolAdapterBuilder.build(configuration);
            return configuration;
        }
    }

    private final T targetDataSource;
    private Metrics metrics;
    private PoolAdapter poolAdapter;

    private Configuration(String uniqueName, T targetDataSource) {
        super(uniqueName);
        this.targetDataSource = targetDataSource;
    }

    public T getTargetDataSource() {
        return targetDataSource;
    }

    public Metrics getMetrics() {
        return metrics;
    }

    public PoolAdapter<T> getPoolAdapter() {
        return poolAdapter;
    }
}

Java-based configuration

If you’re using Spring Java-based configuration then this is how you’d do it:

@org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration
public class FlexyDataSourceConfiguration {

    @Autowired
    private PoolingDataSource poolingDataSource;

    @Bean
    public Configuration configuration() {
        return new Configuration.Builder(
                UUID.randomUUID().toString(),
                poolingDataSource,
                CodahaleMetrics.BUILDER,
                BitronixPoolAdapter.BUILDER
        ).build();
    }

    @Bean(initMethod = "start", destroyMethod = "stop")
    public FlexyPoolDataSource dataSource() {
        Configuration configuration = configuration();
        return new FlexyPoolDataSource(configuration,
                new IncrementPoolOnTimeoutConnectionAcquiringStrategy.Builder(5),
                new RetryConnectionAcquiringStrategy.Builder(2)
        );
    }
}

XML-based configuration

The XML-based configuration is more verbose and not as intuitive as the Java-based configuration:

<bean id="configurationBuilder" class="com.vladmihalcea.flexypool.config.Configuration$Builder">
    <constructor-arg value="uniqueId"/>
    <constructor-arg ref="poolingDataSource"/>
    <constructor-arg value="#{ T(com.vladmihalcea.flexypool.metric.codahale.CodahaleMetrics).BUILDER }"/>
    <constructor-arg value="#{ T(com.vladmihalcea.flexypool.adaptor.BitronixPoolAdapter).BUILDER }"/>
</bean>

<bean id="configuration" factory-bean="configurationBuilder" factory-method="build"/>

<bean id="dataSource" class="com.vladmihalcea.flexypool.FlexyPoolDataSource" init-method="start" destroy-method="stop">
    <constructor-arg ref="configuration"/>
    <constructor-arg>
        <array>
            <bean class="com.vladmihalcea.flexypool.strategy.IncrementPoolOnTimeoutConnectionAcquiringStrategy$Builder">
                <constructor-arg value="5"/>
            </bean>
            <bean class="com.vladmihalcea.flexypool.strategy.RetryConnectionAcquiringStrategy$Builder">
                <constructor-arg value="2"/>
            </bean>
        </array>
    </constructor-arg>
</bean>

Conclusion

You can make use of the Builder pattern no matter the Spring configuration mode you’ve already chosen. If you have doubts about it’s usefulness, here are three compelling reasons you should be aware of.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

* indicates required
10 000 readers have found this blog worth following!

If you subscribe to my newsletter, you'll get:
  • A free sample of my Video Course about running Integration tests at warp-speed using Docker and tmpfs
  • 3 chapters from my book, High-Performance Java Persistence, 
  • a 10% discount coupon for my book. 
Get the most out of your persistence layer!

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *